CA propositions: Everything to know about measures on minimum wage, marriage equality and more

Californians are being asked to ballot connected 10 propositions successful the 2024 election, covering issues from minimum wage and matrimony equality to expanding penalties for immoderate theft and cause crimes.

We've enactment unneurotic a usher to the 2024 propositions successful California. Scroll down to work astir each ballot proposition.

The ballot connection for each proposition is disposable from the Secretary of State's office. Continue speechmaking beneath for our summaries of each measure, the statement for and against it, and a abbreviated database of supporters and opponents.

Prop 2: Authorizes bonds for nationalist schoolhouse and assemblage assemblage facilities

Summary: Authorizes $10 cardinal successful wide work bonds for repair, upgrade, and operation of facilities astatine K-12 nationalist schools (including charter schools), assemblage colleges, and vocation method acquisition programs, including for betterment of wellness and information conditions and schoolroom upgrades. Requires yearly audits.
Argument for: Many schools and assemblage colleges are outdated and request basal wellness and information repairs and upgrades to hole students for assemblage and careers and to clasp and pull prime teachers. Prop. 2 meets those needs and requires strict payer accountability truthful funds are spent arsenic promised with section control.
Argument against: Proposition 2 volition summation our enslaved obligations by $10 billion, which volition outgo taxpayers an estimated $18 cardinal erstwhile repaid with interest. A enslaved works similar a authorities recognition card-paying of that recognition paper requires the authorities to walk much of your taxation dollars! Vote NO connected Prop. 2.
Supporters: California Teachers Association; California School Nurses Organization; Community College League of California
Opponents: Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

Prop 3: Constitutional close to marriage

Summary: Amends California Constitution to admit cardinal close to marry, careless of enactment oregon race. Removes connection successful California Constitution stating that matrimony is lone betwixt a antheral and a woman.
Argument for: Proposition 3 protects Californians' state to marry, careless of their contention oregon gender. Proposition 3 removes discriminatory connection from the California Constitution stating matrimony is lone betwixt a antheral and a woman. Proposition 3 reinforces California's committedness to civilian rights and protects idiosyncratic freedom. Vote YES! YesonProp3CA.com
Argument against: Proposition 3 removes each rules for marriage, opening the doorway to kid marriages, incest, and polygamy. It changes California's constitution adjacent though same-sex matrimony is already legal. By making moms and dads optional, it puts children astatine risk. This careless measurement harms families and society. Vote No connected Proposition 3.
Supporters: Sierra Pacifc Synod of The Evangelical Lutheran Church successful America; Dolores Huerta Foundation; Equality California
Opponents: Jonathan Keller, California Family Council; Rev. Tanner DiBella

RELATED: What is Prop 3? A look astatine CA measurement aiming to support matrimony rights for all

Prop 4: Authorizes bonds for harmless drinking water, wildfire prevention, and protecting communities and earthy lands from clime risks

Summary: Authorizes $10 cardinal successful wide work bonds for water, wildfire prevention, and extortion of communities and lands. Requires yearly audits.
Argument for: Yes connected 4 for harmless drinking water, wildfire prevention, cleanable air, and extortion of earthy resources. California firefighters, conservation groups, cleanable h2o advocates impulse YES. Accountable, fiscally responsible, with autarkic audits, strict transparency. Proactive attack saves wealth and prevents the worst impacts of devastating wildfires, smoke, droughts, and pollution.
Argument against: Bonds are the astir costly mode to money authorities spending. Water and wildfire mitigation are necessities, not luxuries. They should beryllium budgeted for, not bonded. Mismanagement led to this crisis. This $10 cardinal enslaved volition outgo taxpayers astir $2 to repay for each dollar spent. Vote NO connected Prop. 4.
Supporters: Clean Water Action; CALFIRE Firefghters; National Wildlife Federation; The Nature Conservancy
Opponents: Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

Prop 5: Allows section bonds for affordable lodging and nationalist infrastructure with 55% elector approval

Summary: Allows support of section infrastructure and lodging bonds for low- and middle-income Californians with 55% vote. Accountability requirements.
Argument for: Prop. 5 shifts section spending priorities distant from authorities government, giving section voters and taxpayers the prime and the tools to code the challenges facing their communities. Whether it's lodging affordability, safer streets, much occurrence stations, oregon different community-driven projects, Prop. 5 empowers section voters to lick section problems. Vote YES.
Argument against: Prop. 5 changes the constitution to marque it easier to summation enslaved debt, starring to higher spot taxes. Prop. 5 shifts the fiscal load from the authorities to section communities, expanding costs for homeowners, renters, and consumers. Politicians wrote loopholes successful Prop. 5 truthful "infrastructure" tin mean conscionable astir anything.
Supporters: California Professional Firefghters; League of Women Voters of California; Habitat for Humanity California.
Opponents: California Taxpayers Association; California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce; Women Veterans Alliance.

Prop 6: Eliminates law proviso allowing involuntary servitude for incarcerated person

Summary: Amends the California Constitution to region existent proviso that allows jails and prisons to enforce involuntary servitude to punish transgression (i.e., forcing incarcerated persons to work).
Argument for: Proposition 6 ends slavery successful California and upholds quality rights and dignity for everyone. It replaces carceral involuntary servitude with voluntary enactment programs, has bipartisan support, and aligns with nationalist efforts to betterment the 13th Amendment. It volition prioritize rehabilitation, little recidivism, and amended nationalist safety, resulting successful payer savings.
Argument against: No statement against Proposition 6 was submitted.
Supporters: Assemblymember Lori Wilson
Opponents: None submitted

Prop 32: Raises minimum wage

Summary: Raises minimum wage arsenic follows: For employers with 26 oregon much employees, to $17 immediately, $18 connected January 1, 2025. For employers with 25 oregon less employees, to $17 connected January 1, 2025, $18 connected January 1, 2026.
Argument for: YES connected Proposition 32 raises the minimum wage to $18 truthful much SERVICE, ESSENTIAL, AND OTHER WORKERS, and SINGLE MOMS tin AFFORD the state's COST OF LIVING. CORPORATE PROFIT MARGINS INCREASED 100% since 2000 due to the fact that CORPORATIONS SPIKED the PRICES OF GOODS. YES connected PROP. 32 truthful workers tin spend life's basal needs.
Argument against: Prop. 32 was written by 1 multimillionaire alone, and helium wrote a horribly flawed measure. Prop. 32 increases the outgo of living, eliminates jobs, makes our authorities and section authorities fund deficits worse, and makes California's analyzable minimum wage laws adjacent harder for businesses and workers to understand. No connected 32!
Supporters: None submitted
Opponents: California Chamber of Commerce; California Restaurant Association; California Grocers Association

RELATED: Voters to see raising minimum wage to $18 with Proposition 32

Prop 33: Expands section governments' authorization to enact rent power connected residential property

Summary: Repeals Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act of 1995, which presently prohibits section ordinances limiting archetypal residential rental rates for caller tenants oregon rent increases for existing tenants successful definite residential properties.
Argument for: The rent is excessively damn high. One cardinal radical person near California. Rent power successful America has worked to support radical successful their homes since 1919. California's 17 cardinal renters request relief. Homeowners and taxpayers payment from unchangeable communities. The California imagination is dying. You tin assistance prevention it.
Argument against: Don't beryllium fooled by the latest firm landlord anti-housing scheme. California voters person rejected this extremist connection doubly before, due to the fact that it would frost the operation of caller lodging and could efficaciously reverse dozens of caller authorities lodging laws. Vote No connected 33 to support caller affordable lodging and California homeowners.
Supporters: CA Nurses Assoc.; CA Alliance for Retired Americans; Mental Health Advocacy; Coalition for Economic Survival; TenantsTogether
Opponents: California Council for Afordable Housing; Women Veterans Alliance; California Chamber of Commerce

RELATED: What is Prop 33? A look astatine California's ballot measurement connected expanding rent control

Prop 34: Restricts spending of medicine cause revenues by definite wellness attraction providers

Summary: Requires definite providers to walk 98% of revenues from national discount medicine cause programme connected nonstop diligent care. Authorizes statewide dialog of Medi-Cal cause prices.
Argument for: Proposition 34 volition support patients and guarantee nationalist healthcare dollars really spell to patients who request it. Prop. 34 volition adjacent a loophole that allows corporations to walk this wealth connected things similar buying stadium naming rights and multi-million dollar CEO salaries. Protect Patients Now. Vote Yes connected Proposition 34.
Argument against: Prop. 34-The Revenge Initiative. California Apartment Association, representing billionaire firm landlords, doesn't attraction astir patients. Their sole intent is silencing AIDS Healthcare Foundation, the sponsor of the rent power initiative. 34 weaponizes the ballot, is simply a menace to democracy, and opens the doorway to attacks connected immoderate non-profit.
Supporters: The ALS Association; California Chronic Care Coalition; Latino Heritage Los Angeles
Opponents: National Org. for Women; Consumer Watchdog; Coalition for Economic Survival; AIDS Healthcare Foundation; Dolores Huerta

RELATED: What is Prop 34? What to cognize astir the medicine cause revenue-spending measure

Prop 35: Provides imperishable backing for Medi-Cal wellness attraction services

Summary: Makes imperishable the existing taxation connected managed wellness attraction security plans, which, if approved by the national government, provides revenues to wage for Medi-Cal wellness attraction services.
Argument for: Yes connected 35 addresses our urgent healthcare situation by securing dedicated funding-without raising taxes-to support entree to superior and specialty care, assemblage clinics, hospitals, ERs, household planning, and intelligence wellness providers. Prop. 35 prevents the authorities from redirecting funds for non-healthcare purposes. Supported by Planned Parenthood, pediatricians, California Medical Association. www.VoteYes35.com
Argument against: No statement against Proposition 35 was submitted.
Supporters: Planned Parenthood Afliates of CA; American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists; American Academy of Pediatrics
Opponents: None submitted

Prop 36: Allows felony charges and increases sentences for definite cause and theft crimes

Summary: Allows felony charges for possessing definite drugs and for thefts nether $950, if suspect has 2 anterior cause oregon theft convictions.
Argument for: Prop. 36 makes California communities safer by addressing rampant theft and cause trafficking. It toughens penalties for fentanyl and cause traffickers and "smash-and-grabs" portion holding repetition offenders accountable. It targets serial thieves and encourages attraction for those addicted to drugs, utilizing a balanced attack to hole loopholes successful existent laws.
Argument against: Don't beryllium fooled. Proposition 36 volition pb to much crime, not less. It reignites the failed warfare connected drugs, makes elemental cause possession a felony, and wastes billions connected prisons, portion slashing important backing for victims, transgression prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation. This puts prisons archetypal and guts treatment. Vote No.
Supporters: Crime Victims United of California; California District Attorneys Association; Family Business Association of California
Opponents: Diana Becton, District Attorney Contra Costa County; Crime Survivors for Safety and Justice