1 year ago
50
Judge Merchan returned to the seat to cheque connected however the hunt for the jury's requested readback worldly was coming.
"Where bash we stand?" the justice asked.
Prosecutor Josh Steinglass said determination were a "few outstanding issues" requiring Merchan's intervention.
Steinglass said the parties were successful statement astir 3 of the 4 requests, but disagreed implicit the applicable information of the transcript regarding David's Pecker's grounds astir the 2016 Trump Tower meeting.
Steinglass said the lawyers disagreed implicit whether the assemblage should perceive a information of Pecker's grounds regarding what helium relayed astir the gathering to then-National Enquirer exertion Dylan Howard.
"We tried to gully a enactment betwixt the substance of the gathering and the execution," Steinglass told the judge.
"I tin spot wherefore Mr. Blanche has immoderate concerns astir about of this," Merchan said aft reviewing that information of the transcript himself.
Prosecutor Josh Steinglass walked Judge Merchan done each of the disputed portions of the transcript regarding the 2016 Trump Tower meeting, detailing the leafage and enactment fig for each disputed information that the assemblage had requested beryllium work back.
For immoderate of the portions, defence lawyer Todd Blanche expressed interest astir providing excessively overmuch accusation -- not conscionable regarding the taxable of the gathering but its repercussions -- portion Steinglass argued that immoderate of the grounds could make disorder for the jury.
"This contented is some confusing and hard to correct," Steinglass said.
Merchan said that "for the involvement of time," helium would instrumentality the transcript with him aft the proceedings reason and marque a decision.
Told astir about different dispute, Merchan said, "I volition instrumentality this with maine into chambers and fto you cognize what I think."
