Trump's deployment of CA National Guard in LA returns to federal court Tuesday

SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) -- The ineligible conflict implicit President Trump's deployment of the California National Guard successful Los Angeles volition proceed Tuesday successful a national appeals tribunal successful San Francisco.

A justice ruled the determination was amerciable but the lawsuit was enactment connected clasp until it tin spell earlier an appeals tribunal connected Tuesday.

Newly-released video from the courtroom shows State of California authoritative Nicholas Green successful national tribunal past week.

He argued against the Department of Justice's Brett Shumate regarding President Trump's deployment of the California National Guard.

PREVIOUS: Trump tin support National Guard successful LA for present aft appeals tribunal blocks order

"As to the Guard, our presumption is they were not lawfully federalized. If this is not home instrumentality enforcement by the military, unclear to maine what would be," Green said.

Shumate defended the authorities and the President successful his determination to telephone successful the California National Guard.

"The President whitethorn nationalize the authorities National Guard, the governors shall issue, the orders shall beryllium issued done the governors determination is nary consultation request preapproval requirement. The authorities is simply conduit. He's not a roadblock, the President doesn't person to telephone up the governor, invitation them to Camp David, let's person a summit, and negociate for a week astir what are the terms, we're going to telephone up the nationalist defender successful your state," said Shumate.

The 9th Circuit paused U.S. District justice Charles Breyer ruling past week ordering Trump to instrumentality power of the National Guard to Governor Gavin Newsom.

Newsom took the ruling arsenic a triumph moments aft it came down.

"Let's beryllium clear, the National Guard volition travel backmost nether my authorization by noon tomorrow," Newsom said. "The National Guard volition beryllium redeployed to what they were doing earlier Donald Trump commandeered them."

MORE: What happens adjacent successful Newsom's suit implicit Trump's deployment of troops to LA?

"That determination was a enactment enactment successful spot truly doesn't springiness america immoderate denotation of what the tribunal is going to decide," Menlo College governmental subject and law instrumentality prof Melissa Michelson told ABC7 News.

"On the 1 hand, it was a triumph for Trump due to the fact that it means helium maintains power of the troops," Michelson said. "But it doesn't really mean that he's going to triumph successful court. It conscionable means that power wasn't taken distant astatine that Friday noon deadline similar we thought it was going to."

The 4,000 National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles person remained arsenic thousands protested against President Trump crossed the state this weekend.

"One likelihood is that the 9th Circuit says, you cognize what, the little tribunal was correct, Judge Breyer was correct, the troops request to beryllium fixed backmost to the politician close away," Michelson said.

Michelson says there's a accidental Newsom gets power back, oregon the lawsuit could enactment successful limbo a small longer.

MORE: CA Sen. Alex Padilla, Democrats constitute missive to Pres. Trump to region subject from Los Angeles

"Another imaginable result is that they say, well, you know, we're going to instrumentality immoderate much clip to deliberation astir this. And for the foreseeable future, we're going to permission power with the president until we've made a decision," she said.

No substance the decision, Michelson says the lawsuit is apt headed to the Supreme Court.

"Just due to the fact that we cognize that nary substance what, there's astir apt going to beryllium an appeal, doesn't mean that the Supreme Court volition perfectly marque a decision," she said. "But they tin besides marque a determination by not making a determination to instrumentality the case, saying we don't spot a request to reconsider the 9th Circuit decision, we're going to conscionable fto that stand."